Total Pageviews

Sunday, 28 June 2015

AUSTRALIAN DOG BITES CAUSING DEATH 1995 - 2011

It is believed that approximately 28 dogs were involved in 11 deaths between 1995 and 2011 in Australia.  One dog caused 6 fatalities (55%), Two dogs caused 2 fatalities (18%), Three to four dogs caused 2 fatalities (18%) and 11 dogs caused 1 fatality (9%). Ref 3
The four most popular Registered Pure-bred dogs according to the Australian National Kennel Council) were: Labrador Retriever (8.3%), German Shepherd (6.3%), Staffordshire Bull Terrier (5.9%) and Golden Retriever (4.8%) in eighth place is the  Rottweilers (2.4%).
Breeds involved in human deaths were: Rottweiler (4), Siberian Husky (1), Cattle Dog (1), Rottweiler X German Shepherd (1), Dingo X Labrador (1), Pit Bull X Mastiff (1), Great Dane X Mastiff (1), Great Dane X Bull Terrier (1), Medium size mixed breed (3), Large mixed breed (3) and Giant Mixed Breed (11) including Greyhounds, Mastiffs and Irish Wolfhounds.
Australia has an estimated dog population of 3,400,000 and an average of 1.1 fatalities per year (33 over the last 30 years), equating to one death per 3,090,909 dogs.
The following table shows the breeds responsible for these deaths.

Australian Dog Breeds Causing Death. YR 1995 - 2011

Breed
Deaths
Rottweiller
4
Husky
1
Cattle dog
1
Rottweiller GSD X
1
Dingo X lab
1
Pit bull X mastiff
1
Great dane x Mastiff
1
Gread dane x Bull terrier
1
Medium sized mixed breed
3
Large mixed breed
3
Giant mixed breed (11)
11
total
28
From such relatively low numbers of deaths caused by dogs in Australia you might wonder why  breed specific legislation (BSL) is being proposed.
Because the American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT) is not recognised as an official breed in Australia it isn't included in the statistics. It is believed that there are nearly 70,000 Pure-bred, registered “Pit Bull Types” (Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Bull Terrier & Bull Terrier) currently in Australia. Add to this number the unregistered 'pit bulls' and cross breeds and the numbers could be much higher.
It is believed that the American Staffordshire bull terrier (9,000 pure bred and 34,000 mixed breeds) is replacing the banned pit bull breeds such as the APBT.
The relatively low rate of one fatality per year in Australia makes extrapolation of these statistics useless. 

Australian DBRF'S--RSPCA Victorian chief executive Maria Mercurio says the policy has changed since 2009 as there is a lack of research showing pit bulls or any other breed is more prone to attack. "The statistics just aren't there," she says. "Most breeds of dogs can be aggressive and be violent if they are trained and kept that way. We have matured, and our opinion and our policy has evolved."

AUSTRALIAN DBRF'S....
INFANTS and young children remain most vulnerable to dog attack, with two children killed in NSW in the past five years, one in Western Australia, and another little girl in Victoria.
Two-week-old Kate Morey didn't stand a chance when her family's pet Siberian husky attacked her in her cot in Perth in 2007.
A nine-week-old girl from Pakenham on Melbourne's southeastern fringe also died after being dragged from her cot by the family rottweiler in the same year.
In NSW, three-year-old Ruby-Lea Burke died after being savaged by four bull mastiff crosses in the home of her babysitter at Whitton in 2009.
And in 2006, four-year-old Tyra Kuehne wandered into a neighbour's backyard and was killed by up to six dogs in Warren, 540km northwest of Sydney.
The dogs were various crossbreeds of boxer, greyhound, pit bull and mastiff, and had been trained for pig-hunting.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/dog-fight-brews-over-tough-laws/story-e6frg6z6-1226131681378

Saturday, 20 June 2015

"PITBULLS" are just DOGS after all?

Researchers from the American Academy of Family Physicians report that more than 4 million people are bitten by dogs each year. Of these, approximately 800,000 (or about 45 percent) are under the age of 14. Dozens die as a result of these injuries.
Nearly 35 million American households own canines, many more than one, meaning there are more than 55 million dogs in the country. Most of them are never going to be a threat. However, just about any dog has the potential to hurt someone if the circumstances are just right. About half of all reported dog bite cases involve a pet that is owned by either the family of the victim or neighbors.
Often, these involve an animal that is not provoked. Sadly, a large number of deaths involving babies and dogs occur when the baby is simply sleeping.
Even if a bite isn't fatal or cause severe injury, there is a possibility you could be at great risk for an infection. About 20 percent of people bitten suffer some degree of infection. People with the following conditions are at particular risk:
  • Chronic edema (or insufficient blood flow) to the arms or legs;
  • Diabetes;
  • Immune deficiencies;
  • Liver disease;
  • Mastectomy;
  • Those with prosthetic joints or valves;
  • Lupus.
While any dog has the potential to inflict harm, some breeds are known to have a history of greater aggression than others. These include: Cocker Spaniel, Chow Chow, German Shepherd, Grate Dane, Pit Bull, Rottweiler, Siberian Husky, Doberman Pinscher, Collie, Bull Terrier.
By contrast, the least aggressive dogs - those considered to be "family dogs," are: Boxer, Golden Retriever, Dalmatian, Irish Setter, English Setter, Labrador Retriever, English Springer, Spaniel.
Of course, there are Gold Retrievers that have been known to bite, and Rottweilers that are gentle to a fault. It depends on a myriad of factors, but the point is, every dog should be approached as if it has the potential to inflict injury to either you or your child.

CAUSES OF DOG AGGRESSION


CAUSES OF DOG AGGRESSION

Your neighbour may blame you for your dog’s aggressive behavior, but even people who understand dogs and raise them kindly can have a dog who behaves aggressively.  Other people may be the ultimate “alpha” and yet end up with an aggressive dog. And some dogs who were abused never become aggressive.  Some dogs will even behave more or less normally until the dog matures socially around 2 or 3 years of age.  So what are the causes of dog aggression?

What we do to make dog aggression worse

Much of the time people simply have not be taught how to treat dogs (for example, many dogs do not like being hugged) or how to recognize the early warning signs, such as staring, stiffening, licking of the lips when the dog is not hungry, or yawning when the dog is not tired.  When the signs are not recognized the aggression appears sudden when in fact, the dog is not suddenly aggressive at all.  They have been giving us warning signs and we have been missing them.       
The issue: Most canine behavioral problems either involve normal behaviors that people don’t like or understand or anxiety-related concerns that comprise true behavioral diagnoses. – Dr. Karen Overall, Dumbed down by dominance, 2012
In many cases the dog has an underlying condition – often one of anxiety – that can attract the kind of responses from humans that make the situation worse.  Either we become frustrated or we take on bad advice such as intimidating the dog as a way to try to deal with it. Unfortunately outdated methods that have been popularized by the media can make dogs who are predisposed to aggression worse (see the world’s worse dog aggression advice).  Your dog’s behaviour may attract negative responses from other dogs as well, as other dog may sense your dog is not behaving normally and become concerned.  When we react with leash corrections we can cause this conflict to grow.
We don’t always meet the needs of dogs and this can cause problems.  Dogs need stimulation, exercise, social experiences, proper diet, a  certain amount of freedom in many conditions.  A dog that is left along for long periods of time, is left outside all day on the end a leash, is ignored, boredom, frustrate, etc. is going to have more problems than one whose needs are met.
There are ways to minimize this by treating the dog’s aggression using an effective treatment program with methods based on science such as the one outlined in The Dog Aggression System Every Dog Owner Needs e-book.  The e-book also details the kinds of signs to look at for that will help you predict when aggression might occur.
It’s very common for people to feel guilt about their dog’s behavior, because most people feel they have done wrong.  It is so common that people will sometimes deny there is a problem, or procrastinate on getting help.  The e-book is a good low cost option for people to learn about how to improve a dog aggression problem.

Health concerns that can cause dog aggression

There are many reasons for dog aggression.  Sudden aggression in dogs might be a result of medical issues that contribute to dog aggression or simple pain or discomfort of any sort.   It is very common for dogs that are seen by a veterinary behaviorist to also have medical conditions as well.  Your first step should be to see a vet.  However, even when the dog’s aggression is completely a result of pain, it is very likely that you will need to do behavior modification to changer the associations your dog developed while the situation developed.  In addition congenital diseases, disorders or conditions that have occurred in the womb or present close to birth but not necessarily genetic may also play a factor.

Biological contributions that can contribute to dog aggression

There is plenty of evidence that dogs with serious aggression are functionally different than non-aggressive dogs. Serotonin, a neurotransmitter in the brain helps cells communicate to one another.  It has been implicated in aggression across species. New research suggests that changes in serotonin could be a result of the brain producing less neurons (certain brain cells).  Genetics, hormones and interactions between the nervous system and the endocrine system as well may play a part in the development of aggression. As of yet, we have virtually no data on whether dogs can be born with conditions similar to Aspergers or Autism in humans that may cause problems for dogs in social settings.
This does not mean they are beyond help however. There are ways to manage and treat dog aggression just as we would treat people with behavior challenges.  This may include anything from modifying the environment around the dog, to medication to improve dog aggression, to behavior modification.

Poor socialization history

There is a critical period in a dog’s development where dogs need to be socialized.  They need to be socialized to a great number of things to become comfortable later on in life.  But more importantly they need to exposed to these people, animals and situations in a way that results in a positive experience.  Dogs that have negative experiences during this critical phase may find it very difficult to overcome them without a slow and gentle behavior modification program.
The early critical phase is not the only time dogs can develop aggression as a result of negative situations.  This can happen at any time.  For example, dogs that are exposed to abuse, or who get attached by other dogs, or who are frequently put into frustrating or fearful experiences may develop aggression.  But if it happens later in life, it is usually a little easier to change.

Next steps for your aggressive dog

  • Consult your veterinarian to rule out any medical causes of aggression.  
  • Discontinue anything you are doing to make your dog become aggressive.
  • Ensure your dog’s needs are being met adequately.
  • Look into an effective treatment program.  You vet may be able to recommend you to a veterinary behaviorist.  In less serious cases, a force-free trainer who uses positive methods, and has a good background in successful treating aggression may be able to help.
If you want to learn more about treating dog aggression, The Dog Aggression System Every Dog Owner Needs ebook was written to help you with just that.
https://k9aggression.com/dog-aggression-overview/causes-of-of-dog-aggression/


Thursday, 28 May 2015

A New Study discussing the reliability of visual breed identification

In a new study that was just released, researcher Victoria Voith once again exposes the challenges of identifying dominant breeds of mixed breed dogs, even by "experts" in the field.  I think the research is important for a lot of reasons (some different from what others have surmised), and worth reviewing as the world of DNA genetics testing continues to challenge what we think we know about canine genetics, and rapidly adding knowledge to the field.
The Study
In the study, more than 900 people who had professions in the field of animal welfare were asked to watch a 1 minute video of 20 dogs that showed the full view of the front and side of the dog, along with the weights, age, and sex of the dogs. All participants noted that they're breed identification was sometimes used for record keeping purposes and were largely made up of kennel staff, Veterinary Assistants, Animal control Field officers, dog trainers, or other animal control or veterinary/behavior triaining staff.
The survey participants then had to answer the following questions:
Do you think the dog is purebred?  yes/no
If yes, what breed to you think it is?
If No, what do you think is the most predominant breed?
What do you think is the second most predominant breed? If you are unsure, write "mix".
The answers were then compared to the DNA results for the dogs.
The Dogs
Before I get into the results for this, I want to discuss the dogs used, and DNA as a whole. It's very important to note that at this point no one is saying that DNA tests are 100% reliable. Even the researchers who are creating the tests note this. Currently, the Mars Wisdom Panel test (which was used for this analysis) says it has a 90% accuracy rate across all first generation crosses. As dogs get further removed from pure heritage, the results get less and less accurate.
It's very important to note in this study that only ONE of the 20 dogs used came back with 50% or more of any one breed -- so only ONE fell within the 90% accuracy range. So, essentially,we cannot have a lot of certainly of the actual DNA results of almost any of the dogs in the study.  However, with the other 19, we can be 90% certain that the really are very mixed breed dogs and not predominently any one breed.  I think this is very important in how the results are analyzed.
The Results
While this study is far from conclusive because of the very small sample set of dogs, I do believe the initial results are very interesting.
Based on the study results, for 7 of the 20 dogs, more than 10% of the responents thought that the dog was "probably" a purebred dog. For three of the 20, 19% or more of the respondents thought the dog was probably a purebred dog (one of these three was the only dog in the study with a mix of 50% of any one breed - Miniature Pincher - and the majority of respondents incorrectly ID'd the dog as predominently Carin Terrier). 
Also of note, there was agreement among 50% or more of the respondents in the predominent breed in only 7 of the dogs -- and in 3 of them, the visual ID did not match ANY of the DNA identification. In the other 13 dogs (65%) there was no majority guess among the panel.
In 14 of the 20 dogs used, less than half of the guesses included a breed that was even detected by the DNA results. And for one of the dogs, exactly zero of the 859 respondents correctly identified a breed of dog in the mix (and this was the dog with highest breed concentration). 
Discussion
It's important to note why this data is important. In the United States, more than 40% of the canine population is mixed breed. 
For decades, the only possible way to identify mixed breed dogs was through visual identification, and many city juristictions have used such identification to influence their animal control policies.
However, we are now getting a lot of science-based data on the efficacy of such ideals, and the results don't support visual breed ID as a basis for policy:
- Visual ID of dogs is highly inaccurate when compared to DNA results
- The Visual ID of mixed breed dogs is highly subjective, as most 'experts' don't agree on the breeds based on looks
- Even those well-educated in the field are susceptible to judgment biases
Thus, statistical data that has often used to promote breed-specific policies is, and has been, based on visual breed identification that is proving itself to be highly subjective and inaccurate. And if public policy-makers want to rely on scientific and accurate information for their decisions, then the best solution will be to focus solely on behavior-based ordinances that target how dogs (and owenrs) BEHAVE, not how they look. 
Here's a link to the entire Voith Study (very detailed)
Here's a link to the National Canine Research Council's overview of the study.
Here's a link to a very nice visual chart that shows the dogs and the study results for the dogs.

Rethinking Dog Breed Identification in Veterinary Practice

 | | 
by  ()
More Information...

Short Description:
[Abstract Only]

The visual identification of dog breeds is made more difficult when assessing mixed breed dogs. This paper examines whether it is useful for veterinarians to attempt to visually identify mixed breed dogs, especially as a means of predicting future health problems that may be associated with certain breeds. The study recommends that animal hospitals adopt a policy of not using visual identification, and instead explain to their clientele that only purebred or DNA tested dogs will be identified by breed, while others should be identified in different, non-breed specific ways.

Abstract:
Despite the popularity of pure bred dogs in popular culture, and events such as dog shows, almost half (44%) of the dogs living in the United States are mixed breed. For many of these dogs the lineage is almost or completely unknown, and breed is assigned based on visual appearance. Of course, as this paper notes, "it is possible to describe dogs without assigning a breed. In fact, in previous times, dogs were characterized not so much by breed as by their personality." In the past, dogs have been identified as hunting dogs, guard dogs, lap dogs, etc; and in recent times, the American Kennel Club labeled mixed breed dogs that participate in obedience and agility competitions as "all-American dogs." Visual inspection is the most common way of trying to identify the parentage of mixed breed dogs at veterinary hospitals across the U.S. That being said, there are problems with this kind of visual identification. With hundreds of recognized breeds out there, it is almost impossible to accurately identify mixed breed dogs with complete certainty.
Considering that certain health problems are associated with specific dog breeds, misidentification of breeds could potentially lead to misdiagnoses or missed preventative measures. Likewise, considering that many states and countries have breed specific bans in place, misidentifying a dog breed could have dire consequences for the dogs in question. In some cases, vets could potentially be accused of intentional misrepresentation of dog breeds if they got it wrong. Because of these factors, the authors of this study "strongly recommend" that vets adopt a "consistent use of a single non-breed-based term to identify all dogs of unknown lineage, regardless of appearance and regardless of any previous identifications that might have been made." They add that "it is ill advised to alter a dog's medical record, including changing the breed identification, without documenting the change and explaining why the change was made." The researchers advise that it is not a good idea to retroactively apply the policy to existing patients, "unless a DNA analysis has been done to substantiate the change in breed identification and a copy of the test results can be included in the patient's medical record." They also recommend that vets communicate this new policy to new and existing patients with a simple statement such as this: "Because new scientific evidence has called into question the accuracy of visual breed identification of dogs, our hospital has adopted a policy to not identify canine patients by predominant breed unless the dog is purebred, the predominant breed of the dog's parents is known, or the dog's lineage has been established through the use of DNA analysis."
Ultimately, the authors of this paper wish to encourage "a paradigm shift in the veterinary profession's approach to canine breed identification. Specifically, we believe that veterinarians and animal shelters should adopt a policy to avoid visual breed identification of any dog of unknown lineage and should train their staff on the rationale for this policy, including the drawbacks of visual breed identification and misidentification." They note that "this does not preclude including breed information in the medical records of dogs when the owner has actual knowledge of the dog's lineage or when breed identification has been determined by means of DNA analysis." Considering the numerous problems that can arise if dogs are misidentified, it seems like a safer policy to use going forward.

Original Abstract:
Dog breed identification is deeply rooted in veterinary practice. Practice management programs, diagnostic service request forms, and government forms, including health certificates and rabies certificates, all require information on dog breed. Owners may ask for assistance in identifying the breed of newly acquired dogs, and veterinarians frequently use information regarding dog breed to assess the risk that dogs will develop various breed-specific medical problems. However, the utility of breed identification in veterinary practice may not be clear for mixedbreed dogs, particularly when parentage is unknown and must be guessed at on the basis of appearance.

Spot Check Number: 2708
Sponsor: No Sponsor
Researcher/Author: Robert john Simpson, DVM; Kathyrnjo Simpson, DVM, MPH; Ledy VanKavage, JD
Animal Type: Companion Animals, Dogs
Record Type: Journal article
Research Method: Unknown or Not Applicable
Geographic Region: United States National
Number of Participants: Unknown
Population Descriptors: Mixed breed dogs, veterinarians
Year Conducted: 2012

Looking for full text articles?

If the full text of an article is not available, click here for other options.


How do we select database articles?

Want to know how we choose the articles that we share? Click to read about our process.


Support Effective Advocacy and DOUBLE Your Donation
Please donate to HRC so that we can help advocates help animalsmore effectively and efficiently. Donations are being matched!

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

Aggression between Dogs in the Same Household What causes conflict between dogs living in the same home? Post published by Stanley Coren Ph.D., F.R.S.C. on Apr 22, 2014 in Canine Corner

 dog canine pet human animal bond aggression conflict fighting stress
My home typically contains two or more dogs, and research has shown that having more than one dog is typical for nearly one third of dog owning households in North America. In a multiple dog home probably one of the most disturbing situations is when there are aggressive incidents between the dogs. These are not only disturbing for the peace and happiness of the humans living there, but it can also be quite dangerous for the dogs and for the people who try to intervene and break up the fight. A scientific report published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association* looked at this issue, specifically assessing the characteristics of the dogs involved and what can be done to help eliminate the problem of fighting among dogs living together.
Researchers Kathryn Wrubel, Alice Moon-Fanelli, Louise Maranda, and Nicholas Dodman, recruited 38 pairs of dogs that came to the Animal Behavior Clinic at Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine in Grafton, Massachusetts specifically because they were involved in aggressive incidents with their housemates. The research team then conducted in-depth interviews and administered a number of questionnaires in order to determine the characteristics of dogs which had been involved in such situations. Later on they would prescribe a treatment method for the problem.
The first thing that might be surprising to most people is that female dogs are more often involved in such fights then are males. Only 32% of the aggressive incidents involved conflict between two males, while in the remaining 68% females were active participants. This is consistent with some previous research which has shown that when females get into an aggressive situation injuries are apt to be more severe and the fight tends to be longer and more furious.
If we look at the overall characteristics of the dogs involved, we find that the instigators of the aggression are usually the dog who has been most recently brought into the household (70%). Furthermore in 74% of the cases it is the younger dog that starts the fight. These fights are often a surprise to the owners, since 39% of them claim that the dogs usually get along with one another most of the time. The conflicts can be quite intense which is proven by the fact that 50% of them required veterinary care for the dogs and 10% of them required medical attention for the owners who tried to intervene. The reason that the owners were placing themselves in jeopardy was because 54% of them felt that the fight would not stop unless they separated the dogs physically, and only 8% of them successfully separated the dogs using learned obedience commands.
What tends to trigger a fight among housemates? The actions of the owner, such as paying attention to one dog rather than the other, are a trigger for 46% of the pairs. Simple excitement, usually involving the owner's arrival or other activities was involved in 31%. Conflict over food was involved in 46% of the pairs while found items or toys are triggers in 26%.
There appear to be a number of risk factors which the study isolated for one or both of the dogs. Among the pairs of dogs involved in aggressive incidents 41% had at least one member who had lived in multiple households. When at least one of the dogs in the pair was 12 weeks of age or older when adopted the rate of conflict was 39%, dogs adopted from a shelter were involved in 33% of the cases and dogs from pet shops in 16%.
There is some evidence that dogs involved in aggressive situations with the dogs that they live with do have a tendency to show aggression in other situations. For example, 40% have shown aggression to other dogs, 27% have shown aggression toward humans living in the household, and 27% toward human strangers, but most distressingly 20% have shown aggression toward their owner.
Aggression may not be their only problem since 50% of the pairs of dogs involved in conflicts had at least one member with noticeable separation anxiety, and 30% had phobias, fearfulness, and other forms of anxiety.
The good news is that aggression between housemates does appear to be treatable using behavioral techniques that owners can institute at home. The first of these is the technique that Nicholas Dodman calls "nothing-in-life-is-free". This simply requires the dogs to respond to some simple learned command (such as "sit", "down", "come" etc.) before they get any resource that they want (their meal, a treat, petting, attention and so forth). The second of these involves "supporting" one of the dogs, meaning that the chosen dog gets everything first (food, treats, attention etc.). Here the problem is which dog to select, and a pragmatic way of doing this is to choose the dog that is larger, stronger, healthier, more active and so forth. An alternate way (which seems to fit with human notions of priority, deference and respect, is to select the "senior" dog, where here the word "senior" means the dog which was in the household first, and has lived for the owner the longest. Both of these methods work, but not instantaneously since on average the data shows that noticeable improvement does not occur until more than five weeks after the process starts. The "nothing-in-life-is-free" technique produced improvement in 89% of the pairs, while the "senior support technique" produced improvement in 67% of the pairs. The researchers suggest that these techniques work for two reasons. First, because the dogs must act in a controlled manner, this takes some of the excitement and arousal out the situation. Secondly, because events occur in a predictable order, and the dogs learn that each of them will eventually get what they want and no conflict is needed.
It is important to note that the sex of the dogs not only makes a difference in the likelihood of conflict but also in the likelihood of improvement with behavioral treatment. As we noted in the beginning of this article, female dogs are more likely to engage in conflicts with their housemates and their fights are apt to be more serious. This is consistent with the fact that the improvement with behavioral treatment is found to be less pronounced, although still significant, in female pairs. In the male-male pairs, conflict was reduced in 72%, of the cases while for male-female pairs the reduction was 75%. In the female-female pairs the reduction was for only 57%, which, although not as large as in the other pairings is still a reasonable improvement rate, and well worth the effort.
To read more about canine aggression click here.
 Copyright SC Psychological Enterprises Ltd. May not be reprinted or reposted without permission
*Data from: Kathryn M. Wrubel, Alice A. Moon-Fanelli, Louise S. Maranda, and Nicholas H. Dodman (2011). Interdog household aggression:38 cases (2006–2007). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 238, 731–740